The “Big Bang” Theory and “Black Holes”
The “Big Bang” theory was developed on the premise that if a system is expanding, then one can reverse the coefficients of expansion and arrive at a time when expansion began and also reveal the distances to the beginnings of the Universe. The Big Bang theory assumes all matter [and energy] in the entire Universe was compressed to a “Black Hole”, defined as a “Singularity” and then exploded, creating our present Universe.
Just give this some rational consideration; proponents believe [?] one can peer back in time, using telescopes, and find “The Edge [beginning] of our Universe”. Their expected result is because they propose the deeper our instruments penetrate space, the older the source of light. This is in fact true, but their premise is that eventually we will discover “the beginning of light emissions”, which in turn will define distance to the edge, or beginning of the Universe. This is a dual theory, one depending on the other to prove both. This type of conjecture is sometimes labeled “a corrupted syllogism”.
There was a time when “Western Thinking” believed the Earth was flat and one could sail off the edge into oblivion. The next phase was that the Sun was “The Center of the Universe”. Other academic proposals included the premise that man would not survive traveling beyond “60 miles per hour”. Next, scientists proclaimed [in my lifetime] that the 1940’s flight of the X-1 rocket, when attaining the speed of sound would render the body of the pilot, Chuck Yeager, into a “pile of mush” due to the harmonics encountered. I believe it was 1947 when he successfully broke the sound barrier in flight.
There is no edge of our Universe; that is why the term “infinity” is used. Infinity defines “no beginning or ending”. The human mind attempts to attach limiters to anything in order to measure the magnitude of our understanding of that item of interest. If one rationally considers the theory, it is ludicrous to apply the minuscule phenomena of a black hole exploding to the creation of the entire Universe.
If you give this theory some rational thought it should sound like a miracle from Genesis in the Holy Writ. It has no basis other than; observations of stellar bodies indicate an expansion of the area and distances between these bodies is occurring. This has no relationship to their theory of a pinpoint “Singularity” explosion.
The theory infers that the Universe is a “bubble” of material and energy, in what? If nothing is beyond the bubble, what is nothing? When reviewed rationally it is simply a mind game to impress other Academics. There are extremely valuable discoveries yet to be made exploring the Universe and we do have tremendous photos and scientific data gathered from deep space studies and probes. It is fascinating data!
I think it is more important to research how Man colonized Earth and what has caused our world civilizations and religions to develop as they have, than to debate the “origins” of the Universe.
How about this thought on their theory; it is something which will never be proven or dis-proven in many lifetimes. It cannot even be equated to medieval scientists proving to Brother Pope that the Earth revolved around the Sun and that the Earth is round. You can be certain that this Big Bang Theory will result in uncountable Millions of dollars bankrolling various studies which hopefully will make everyone’s life better.
The distances to stellar observations can be 7,000 light years and much more. Recent deep space photographs have captured “Black Holes” freely existing in the Universe. The black holes were without surrounding stars or gasses being devoured by massive gravitational forces. This discovery will radically change the physics of the Universe and Academia will go nuts over this.
Free existing Black Hole [Artist’s rendition from NASA data]
Understand that for scientists to produce the above image rendition required a vast amount of observations of light spectrums, magnetic patterns, stellar shadow variations, various radio and energy waves and much more. It also required a collaborative effort of imaginations to depict an image which does not exist in reality. The image is based on a rendition of data, not a visual observation.
These “Theories” are presented with the same widespread acceptance of the theories that unseen “spiritual” entities can enter our minds and communicate Devine messages and protection, or create demonic actions. These various theories are the result of massive collaborative efforts by Academia and Theology to control your imaginations. This collaborative effort has been ongoing for thousands of years, and is the result of teaching, rather than independent thought processes. As with the imaginary renditions of a “Singularity” beginning, or of a “Black Hole”, the imaginary renditions of “Mind altering Gods” requires a tremendous amount of mindless acceptance of superstitions. Each of us creates enough mental images and superstitions to complicate our own sphere of existence. We have the ability as Humans to delve into the imaginary realm and also to discern what is rational in our lives.
